Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.



While it sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.